Peer-reviewed
JAMA Psychiatry
View PDF Read on Journal's Website

Effect of Shamiri Layperson-Provided Intervention vs Study Skills Control Intervention for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Adolescents in Kenya: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background:

Sub-Saharan Africa has fewer than 2 mental health workers per 100,000 people. To bridge this gap, researchers developed Shamiri, a group intervention delivered by young, locally-recruited lay providers rather than trained therapists. This study examined whether this approach could effectively treat adolescent depression and anxiety.

Methods:

694 Kenyan secondary school students with depression or anxiety symptoms were randomly assigned to receive either Shamiri (focusing on growth mindset, gratitude, and values) or a study skills program, both delivered in 4 weekly group sessions by trained lay providers. Depression and anxiety symptoms were measured before treatment, immediately after, and at 2-week follow-up.

Findings:

Both groups showed symptom improvements, but Shamiri was more effective. At follow-up, 80% of Shamiri participants showed clinically meaningful improvement in depression compared to 66% in the control group. For anxiety, 82% of Shamiri participants improved versus 72% of controls. Effects were maintained two weeks after treatment ended.

Implications:

Lay providers can effectively deliver mental health interventions to adolescents in low-resource settings. The Shamiri model offers a scalable approach to addressing the mental health treatment gap in Africa, demonstrating that brief interventions focused on character strengths can produce clinically significant improvements without requiring specialized mental health training.